2008 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 630 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (447 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Aspen | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Aspen | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1410 mm |