2008 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler Aspen. (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 657 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Aspen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Aspen. (447 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Aspen | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Aspen | Ram |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 8276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 691 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 13.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 26.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 98 L |