2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 490 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Crossfire | Omni |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 242 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 49 L |