2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1993 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 307 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 1993 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | Crossfire | ES |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2213 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |
