2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 277 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (311 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Crossfire | Mustang |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 242 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |