2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan SUT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan SUT would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1999 Nissan SUT. (140 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan SUT.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. (311 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | SUT |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 372 Nm |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |