2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 18 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crossfire | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2374 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |
