2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Crossfire | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |