2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2007 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Armada. (318 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. (420 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 2007 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | Armada |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 5552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |