2008 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Crossfire | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | Pixo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 242 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2360 mm |