2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 930 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chrysler | Riley |
Model | Grand Voyager | RM A |
Year Released | 2008 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2870 mm |