2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 59 kg more than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Voyager | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 109 L |