2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (175 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 980 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Grand Voyager | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |