2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |