2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager (175 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 957 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Equator |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3260 mm |
