2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Grand Voyager | E-350 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |