2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Neon (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 663 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Neon | 1962 DAF 750 | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | Neon | 750 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 662 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2060 mm |
