2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 585 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1965 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Neon | MK X |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 63 L |