2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1975 Volvo 260
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 260 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1975 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1975 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1975 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Neon | 260 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |