2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 280 kg more than 1981 Renault 18.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Neon | 18 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |