2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1982 Renault 14
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 14 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 440 kg more than 1982 Renault 14.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 14. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 14.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1982 Renault 14 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Neon | 14 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 69 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 48 L |