2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1983 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 235 kg more than 1983 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Telstar (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon. 1983 Ford Telstar has automatic transmission and 2008 Chrysler Neon has manual transmission. 2008 Chrysler Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Telstar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1983 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Telstar |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2520 mm |