2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Neon (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 215 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Tempo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |