2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 141 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (155 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | Neon | Bravo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |