2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1997 Eagle Talon

To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Eagle Talon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Eagle Talon would be higher. Both 2008 Chrysler Neon and 1997 Eagle Talon are equipped with a 1,996 cc engine.

Because 1997 Eagle Talon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Eagle Talon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Eagle Talon (289 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm). This means 1997 Eagle Talon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Chrysler Neon 1997 Eagle Talon
Make Chrysler Eagle
Model Neon Talon
Year Released 2008 1997
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 0 HP
Torque 178 Nm 289 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1330 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]