2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Neon (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 605 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 2008 Chrysler Neon has manual transmission. 2008 Chrysler Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Neon | 1999 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Neon | Smart |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 18.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 22 L |
