2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 455 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Neon | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |
