2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (285 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon. 2003 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2008 Chrysler Neon has manual transmission. 2008 Chrysler Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Neon | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Neon | C70 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 68 L |
