2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 26 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen Xsara (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2004 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | Neon | Xsara |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1291 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 54 L |