2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 650 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Neon | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Chrysler | GMC |
| Model | Neon | Canyon |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 102 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 72 L |
