2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 561 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Neon | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Neon | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 1810 mm |
