2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2006 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 97 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hyundai Matrix (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 2006 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2006 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Hyundai |
Model | Neon | Matrix |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |