2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 285 kg more than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mitsubishi Colt (211 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2007 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2007 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Neon | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 84.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 47 L |