2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, both 2008 Chrysler Neon and 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR were released in the same year (2008). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 15 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 903 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Chrysler | Koenigsegg |
Model | Neon | CCXR |
Year Released | 2008 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1064 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1996 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 22 L/100km |