2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2009 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Forester weights approximately 130 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Forester (306 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (177 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2009 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
Model | Neon | Forester |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 177 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |