2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2011 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2011 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 250 kg more than 2011 Lancia Ypsilon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Neon (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Lancia Ypsilon. (128 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Lancia Ypsilon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2011 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | Neon | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12 seconds | 10.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 47 L |