2008 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 775 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Voyager | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Sunbeam |
| Model | Voyager | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 27 L |
