2008 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 95 kg more than 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Voyager | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Voyager | Starfire |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 6965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |