2008 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Voyager | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Voyager | FTO |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
