2008 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 410 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Voyager. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Voyager | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Voyager | Econoline |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 219 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3510 mm |