2008 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star would be higher. At 2,766 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Voyager (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 933 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Voyager (360 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. 2008 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Voyager | 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Voyager | Space Star |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2766 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2175 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
