2008 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Voyager (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Voyager | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | Voyager | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 219 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 33 L |