2008 Citroen Berlingo vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Citroen Berlingo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,866 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Citroen Berlingo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2008 Citroen Berlingo. (69 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen Berlingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen Berlingo weights approximately 93 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Berlingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Berlingo. (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Berlingo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Berlingo | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Berlingo | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1866 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 142 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.7 seconds | 6.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |