2008 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 1965 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen C-Crosser | 1965 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Citroen | Citroen |
| Model | C-Crosser | 2CV |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 19 L |
