2008 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Acura TL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2008 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C-Crosser | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | C-Crosser | TL |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |