2008 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser weights approximately 114 kg more than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen C-Crosser | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
| Model | C-Crosser | LS |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 3932 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 280 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.6:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1711 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
