2008 Citroen C1 vs. 1979 Mazda 121
To start off, 2008 Citroen C1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda 121 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda 121 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 121 weights approximately 259 kg more than 2008 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 121 (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 121 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C1 | 1979 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C1 | 121 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2520 mm |