2008 Citroen C1 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2008 Citroen C1 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 310 kg more than 2008 Citroen C1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen C1 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | C1 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2540 mm |
