2008 Citroen C1 vs. 1996 Rover 400

To start off, 2008 Citroen C1 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 400 weights approximately 420 kg more than 2008 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C1.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Citroen C1 1996 Rover 400
Make Citroen Rover
Model C1 400
Year Released 2008 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 1993 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 93 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 3440 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2630 mm