2008 Citroen C1 vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Citroen C1 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 482 kg more than 2008 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C1. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen C1 | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C1 | 3 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1282 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |
